Thursday 16 February 2017

Restoration/The Rover: Blog 4

7/2/17:


Today we had a costume fitting and then had a full run of the play in class.

Costume:

We went through the options on the rack and came to the conclusion of using a very bright blue waist coat and, the same colour. A white shirt will be worn underneath, preferably one that looks fairly plain and could fit in with the era so none with any breast pockets on them. I'm also wearing white shoes with white socks with black shorts. The wig I'm wearing will be white and will be wearing quite a lot of make up as I should do. I do really like my costume and feel it fits very well since the colours are very bright and they're against white and black which causing some clashing and contrasting which makes the combination more vibrant or noticeable which is so in-keeping with the character archetype. When wearing the full costume (With the exception of the make up) I genuinely felt more animated and outgoing. Even when interacting with people outside of the scene I still kept my pose and made me seem more colourful in terms of how I acted which is a very good thing, I noticed quite a few people doing this as well today so overall I'm very pleased with the costume and feel it does help bring out the confidence of the character and style.


Developments:

We did more or less complete the blocking for the scene. We now have it so that two men (James and Logan) are waiting behind the screen where I believe Lucetta is.

I now approach the screen and the guys pop their heads out and jump me. I need to be fairly loud when I scream "Rogues! Dogs! Pimps!" because when I originally did it it sounded far more casual than it should have despite have a fair bit of energy. A detail I feel I must keep in mind for this moment is that there is a moment of acknowledgement and shock where I see them and someone nitpicking the scene could say that I could run off in that time although to get rid of any possible flaw with that moment, I think it needs to be filled by something like a gasp or a scream so there's no quiet and it keeps the pace up.

An idea that we tried out was one that Georgia thought of where she grabs my head and then pulls it towards and onto her breasts or in reality her lower shoulder. I thought this is a great idea since it's a step closer to fully embracing the playful, "Romantic" nature of this scene and the deception is getting more and more believable which is nothing but a good thing. My addition to that idea is my reaction, I thought of when she puts my head back up after finishing her sentence, I should look out towards the audience, sway my head a little as if I'm dazed with an expression that denotes "Wow! This is really happening." although with no attempt to break the fourth wall at that moment, it's just to add to the comedy of it and show how easily he's being manipulated. When trying out this little moment it didn't go as planned, when she threw my head back up, my wig came off and made us both laugh quite a lot and took us both a minute to get focused again. This is a small problem with a simple fix; one of use is gonna have to hold on to the wig so that it doesn't too much momentum when going back up. I think Georgia should be the one to do that since it would look odd if I did it.

I'm still a little off when it comes to my last paragraph although I am getting better, if I'm prompted with the beginning of a sentence them I'm fine it's just getting them in the right order and it does slip from my mind still.                            

One thing I really need to rehearse is the moment where I rush to get undressed. There were a couple issues with it, mainly that it looked awkward, I just piled my clothes in the middle of the floor and that of all moments didn't really have any excited energy about it and it seemed as though as I was trying to play it cool rather than uncontrollable excitement. We fixed the pile issue by placing a chair relativity close to where I will stand so that I can walk over to it and and arrange my clothes semi neatly on it. An idea I had for this part of the scene is when I take my wig off; I feel I should take it off and then swing my head as if I'm loving taking all of it off so I can quickly get to what I think I'm a bout to have. It should act as a quick visual indicator of his haste, he's not even going to sort out his hair, he wants to get to it fast and the swing in his mind may sort out any potential messy hair he might have. A small detail but one that should be humorous and hint at his mindset a tad more. It also keeps in line with the very self indulgent, pompous nature of the character archetypes actions and is in-keeping with how the style mocks everyone in it by making them look like up themselves fools. It adds further to the build up of him getting his dreams crushed and makes the pay off potentially funnier and is the idea since these plays were meant to be fun.

A small problem with the ending was the fumbling scene again and I felt awkward since the lights were on and felt I looked stupid, which shouldn't be the case since it's a key element of this style; you're meant to look silly. So really that's a moment I just need to embrace more and put a little more energy into because it wasn't funny at all, it was just awkward. For it to be funny I think I need to go all and and look ridiculous.

I made a development with figuring out some dialogue. With the line "I was a fool not to learn of Fred, a little by heart before I came." I apparently placed a pause in that sentence at a very awkward time and it didn't sound right. After a brief conversation we came to the conclusion that that sentence meant I should have learnt a few romantic phrases to say to her while with her to make everything go well while he was with Fred but now he has to make up his own. This later made me realise what another line meant. The line "Sheartlakins there I think had it." is said right after he says he need no other light than that of her eyes and that for him is a eureka moment and he acknowledges to the audience that he thinks that worked and was right to get her more in the mood.


8/2/17:


Today we had a rehearsal session of running the play as normal but afterwards came an interesting twist since we had to go over all the dialogue in our scenes and adapt it to fit a contemporary scenario. This didn't mean that we literally had to translate each word into modern English, it was just generalising it so that we could display an understanding of the scenes/characters and actually see if there's any elements of that contemporary performance that we could bring into the restoration performance. That doesn't just mean in terms of acting style though. The main thing I thought it brought to the scenes was a greater sense of how the characters felt and this brought out the comedic nature a little more. I'm admittedly not very good at figuring out what this kind of dialogue means when I watch it and by extension most people can't really figure it out either so something important to do is to convey how you're feeling and what you're doing through the the tone of your voice and the body language. If you are fairly lacking in both of those and just rely on the words then you'll lose your audience fairly quickly, so if you focus on that then it will help to convey what you're character is doing. Before we all got notes saying it seems as though we're acting or just going through the motions and this experiment was an effort to get the best elements to get rid of that fault.

When watching them I did actually understand what was going on in very scene although, while that maybe due to it being in modern English, the situation felt more real despite still having that comedic edge to it. When rehearsing I found it very difficult to not go into any kind of restoration pose when saying my lines or give an attempt to over articulate my lines but I showed some restraint and managed to tone it down.

A note of criticism I had got a couple of time before was that on the line "We'll ne'er mind settlements" it never seems like I actually know what I'm saying so I decided to look up the words and see. I knew Ne'er meant never but it was the word "Settlement" that made the sentence click for. Whenever I usually hear the word settlement, it makes me think of a place but another definition for it could be agreement or understanding. After finding that out it and coupling it with the line "Send him out of this world" it seems as though he's heavily implying he'd much rather have him killed to avoid any confrontation or potential bargaining on either part. He thinks it is for both his and Lucetta's sake, he's just assuming that she would prefer and be OK with this. The fact that he would just assume this of her despite barely knowing her really does show how naive and internally cruel he can be, it's actually quite a good example of darker humour in my opinion, when I realised what he was implying and what was going on around him I did actually find it a tad funny due to the misunderstanding and the jump in logic he makes. It shows what a loser he really is and how highly he thinks of himself which makes his downfall in this scene all the more satisfying or at the very least humorous.

I unfortunately didn't get to perform with the modern twist since Georgia felt unprepared which was a shame because I honestly felt ready to do it and having discovered a couple of definitions, I wanted to try them out. A note to give myself when looking back at it is that when rehearsing it, I played blunt as a more likeable, innocent and reserved person which I felt was wrong, I don't see blunt like that at all. He knows what he wants and is seemingly willing to do some harsh things to get it. His view of women may be just a product of the time and only be more of a flaw to a contemporary audience but he is not a wholly likebale person although it is worth pointing out he's not a bad person either he's just a very flawed man which is what makes him actually quite interesting to me.

I'm very glad we did this otherwise I would have probably noticed the meaning of some of my lines at a later date and had less time to work with them.



9/2/17:

Today we had a full costume run and overall it went pretty well. There were a few issues with it such as people forgetting their lines or with our scene being a tad underplayed but I thought it was pretty good and shows some potential.

Something I was asked was about the line "Would she'd go with me into England". I'd been phrasing it like a question the whole time despite the fact there was no question mark in the script. In my first read through I honestly just though it was a typo and seeing as the sentence began with "Would" I just assumed it was a question although I should've taken into account how language has changed of the years. I genuinely didn't think of that. It turns the line means "I wish she'd go with me to England" as in it's a statement and trying it out like that was actually pretty good and didn't sound forced or awkward as well as making it more clear what I want.

During the final rehearsal in the theatre I did get a few laughs so I'm fairly confident I upped my energy in that performance but in the out of costume performance with Mike , I feel it was very underplayed. I do put this down to the fact I was performing with Mike and he was trying to be funny but I still could've put more effort in the the expressiveness of my character. I lacked the posture during and projection during that run which is bad because it was something we were focusing on in terms of trying to get right since we're getting close to the performance date. I just don't think I was warmed up properly since I've got very close to what I need to be before but the first run was pretty bad.

A note we were given was to watch the pacing of our lines and especially the gaps in between them. I personally think the gaps between our lines are fine in mine and Georgia's scene although sometimes we do still say our lines a tad too fast. I noticed this with my first line when I go to my aside. This isn't good since I'm meant to be telling them my inner feelings and show the complexity of my character so if I just rushed my lines and then no one hears me, it could take away an entire dynamic from the scene, they would never see the contrast at it's full potential. Even during the last run through I said the call for help quite quickly so I had to change it and elongate it. In subsequent run throughs though we slowed down a little and it did sound better

An idea I had was when I say "False? Sheartlakins what does thou take me for? A Jew?". I usually say that line with a sort accusation tone and I feel, thinking about it now, that that is very wrong. In this circumstance he would be doing anything like that, he's being very careful about what he's saying and how he says it. For him to all of a sudden stop and say something that seems like an accusation would seem dangerous and would turn her off from sleeping with him. Also the line that comes before it "Should you be false or cruel?" means are you lying to me or teasing me, I didn't know this until today so the appropriate response would be to try and charm her or be playful so I've now changed it to that and it seems far more fitting now.

I still feel I can contrast my asides and real moments a little more, I do feel I'm making progress with that though. Something I tried out today was making the voice in the real moments sound deeper and the voice in the asides closer to my voice (Although still retaining the overly articulate accent) and with a change in posture to further enforce it. The aside will have a more nervous energy to it but the real moments will appear like an act and be more overplayed. This is what he's feeling inside and to show nit could make how he's acting towards Lucetta possibly funnier or at least more engaging/interesting.

An update on the witty prose dialogue, I think it's all coming together now, there is a degree of spontaneity to my (and Georgia's) dialogue and it all implies a fun tone and nothing boring, dull or dark and depressing, it's all relativity well paced and sometimes snappy. Best of all it doesn't seem awkward saying anything since we've taken time to look at and analyse what our lines mean so overall the structure and pace of our dialogue is being well delivered so hopefully we'll keep it up.



Final Character Profile:


- Who am I?  

My characters name is Ned Blunt. A very wealthy man from England. He is quite an attention seeker and due to the fact he is in a place where he is unknown he wants as many people to notice his as possible and he likes to play up the fact that he is a foreigner. Of the group of friends that he is involved with in this play, he is by far the wealthiest which is what makes his downfall and robbery all the more funny, tragic or ironic that it is all that that results in him getting taken advantage of.


- What time is it?  

It is around 9 pm and it's dark outside so the room they are in has very little natural light and only one candle lamp giving them a light source although it is fairly strong.


- Where am I?  

He is in Naples, Italy, in the house of a woman called Lucetta.


- What surrounds me?  

We are in her bedroom and it is a beautiful place, he even comments on it saying it's "Rich and fine". the main two objects in the room are the screen which Lucetta (and the two kidnapping thugs) hide behind and then there is the the bed, which is the thing he wants to find the most while he's in the dark room since that will get him his woman. There is one big candle lamp lighting the room which he has to put out which is lighting the room decently.


- What are my given circumstances?  

He has met a woman at a carnival named Lucetta and she has tempted him back to her house but he is unaware that all she wants is to rob him and leave him with nothing. He is being too up himself and optimistic about the situation that he doesn't express any real caution.


- What are my relationships?  

His relationship for this scene is that he feels she is really in love with him. He is extremely flattered and happy that this woman is seemingly willing to cheat on her husband for someone like him. He isn't very good with women in general so this really means something although his trust for her is unwarranted but very strong.


- What do I want and what is in my way?  

He desperately wants to have sex with this woman who he firmly believes is in love with him but there a couple problems that may prevent him from going all the way with her. The first is that all his friends and acquaintances warn him she's "Just a whore" who is just lying to him and he doesn't want to believe that, she's done such a good job convincing him, his optimism has taken over. Another is that he believes this woman has a husband, whether or not she really does doesn't matter but he does think he exists and he just views this husband as an annoyance more than anything. The last one is the fact he can't really figure out any romantic things to say to her. He didn't learn any from his friend before he came round to her and no he's worried that it may affect his chances.


- What do I do to get what I want?  

He completely ignores everyone that doubts her love for him and just blindly accepts her invitation. Even though he feels she is already in love with him, he still feels the need to try and maintain that by saying romantic things to her so he's trying to make some up and in his mind succeeds at the end when he thinks she is in bed. In terms of the husband, he suggests that he is willing to have him killed so that it would avoid any conflict between the two of them which is rather extreme to immediately think of but that is what he's willing to do. He'd probably pay someone to do it rather than do it himself though.


Conclusion: 

Overall for this session I think I am representing the style well, my posture and gestures are fairly camp, I have got a great amount of contrast in the asides, I jest need to go even further with everything. I really think I'm almost there, I just need a little more energy and to make everything either more out there or more contrasting and interesting. I'm nearly there with all my lines and when I'm not nervous about performing them I actually can remember them. I feel I have over the past week made quite a lot of progress in figuring out the dialogue and just overall representing the style relatively well. So I'm looking forward to performing this tomorrow.


Restoration/The Rover: Blog 3

30/1/17:

Ideas:

Today I had an idea when practicing the script. While reading it I felt my delivery is fairly bland or just lacked something. This may have been due to a lack of energy because of rehearsing at home but I still felt the need to experiment, so something I did was to give the lines a more sexually suggestive/flirty tone. For example when I say "I'm an honest gentleman and thy humble servant", I made it more sexually suggestive by lowing my voice at that point and emphasising "Humble servant". The reason I chose those works to give that tone was because "Humble" can mean "Submissive" and "servant" implies a willingness to do whatever she wants, which in this case he thinks is sex so applying that to those words brings across his willingness and makes his objective much clearer. I did this because it felt fitting to the context of the situation. Blunt does genuinely think this woman loves him and wants to have sex with him, and since he isn't very good with woman he'll pretty much do anything to secure his chance by either romancing her or being suggestive and turning her on, or at least that's his plan.


Line learning:

I must admit I'm finding the lines a little difficult to learn and any time I rehearse them I have at least one blank every run through I have. Today however, when running through I noticed I'm getting better at it, although that's just remembering the lines and not really how to say them. I'm still completely off with remembering the final paragraph so that's an area I'll have to focus on for a bit. I do still stand by what I said, the prose structure mixed with words I mostly don't understand it making it a tad difficult although that can easily be sorted by just looking the words up since there are still sentences I'm kind of unsure of what they actually mean although I have ideas.



31/1/17:

Today Georgia was not in so I had to run through my lines a lot. Although I did also try out what I thought of yesterday and even tried applying it to other lines.

I rehearsed my scene with Katrina filling in for Georgia and I put what I thought up into action and decided to really overplay it since it was more of a line running than anything so I was more just messing around/experimenting. This turned out to be a good thing because when I got to the line "And thou shalt see what haste I'll make to quit scores. Oh the luckiest rogue", she immediately commented that the character sounded horny, which was exactly the point. So I felt that was I was doing was right in overplaying him and making his emotions very clear to the point of being comical. I was doing a much deeper voice than usual during this rehearsal so I don't know for now if I should stick with that because it may potentially sound too artificial to the point where it's not believable at all. It didn't sound far off from a character like Duke Nukem which is way too deep but I feel my mannerisms also played a part in the result, I just need to make the voice a tad higher and then I'll be good to go.


Research/Themes:

A theme I think is prominent in the play and I feel definitely my scene is that of feminism. The play was written by Aphra Behn and she was the first female playwright and this was during a time when women were allowed to be on stage after a long long period of rejection from the stage so it's seems fitting that the women in this play are often the ones who seem in control. I can fully understand why this would be the case since men had been the dominant sex in theatre for so long, it was time to change it up a bit. It does have some strong female character especially two of the leads, Florinda and Hellena, they both have their set goals and do what they don't seem to want to rebel just for the sake of it, they genuinely feel that by rebelling it would better themselves. The way it's reflected in my scene is it's depiction of a woman being fully able to take advantage of a man by exploiting his ego. The character refers to women as whores and seems to degrade them a bit. He is mainly there for sex although he is probably convincing himself that he feels love for her. This is quite shallow behaviour so it's fitting that it backfires on him. Woman acting like this in this era was considered new at the time and it was actually very well received upon release even by King Charles II, so the strong depiction of women was a very good thing for the art of theatre. In the context of the era, this scene does have an advantage since you may only have a suspicion about Lucetta's intentions and it may subvert any audience members expectations or at least at the time. It would both trick the audience and the character potentially so That's an interesting parallel and use of the innovation in the art.

This scene seems to suggest that people should express caution or not be overly optimistic. It does express this in a more light hearted manner than thinking about that theme would suggest but it's honestly what I get from it. It is very stupid that he's in a newer environment to him and trusts complete strangers enough to go to their houses. I see this as a basic message for nowadays but during when it was originally performed this was probably a comedic way to deliver the message for that audience. People back then were very open to meeting anyone they could and sex was rampant during this time so a lot of people weren't really cautious about who they went with. This could have been a scene to tell them to be more careful.



1/2/17:

Today we continued to block the scene and try and nail the the entrance. Georgia was still rather nervous and shy about playing someone manipulatively sexual. This led to us doing an exercise where we run the scene but act as over the top as possible so we could scale it back afterwards to take away the potential awkwardness. I personally didn't feel that awkward when performing but I must say it gave me a greater sense of how overplayed it actually has to be. I thought about it as bit more and considering the context, the extreme manipulation and the intense passion (as well as other emotions) that my characters is experiencing, it does seem a potentially rather over the top and funny scenario even when not taking into account the acting style so when we get all of our movement, posture and vocals to the correct standard it should be ridiculous which will be great.

Something I asked is where would the bed of the scene actually be located and we eventually came to the decision that there will be no bed and my my line "In bed, my sweet mistress?" to "Undressed, my sweet mistress". The reason I originally asked was just so I could get a better sense of what I was doing in the moments where I was fumbling around looking for the bed. Now, my character can't find it and it seems as if I'm going to go for the folding screen/towards where I think she is, so I'll probably have to bumble around the front of the stage and then circle around the whole area and then go towards it ready for the end. Since there is no bed no it makes what I'm doing seem more awkward if I kept it in my dialogue. So to say I have to get undressed and then quickly go into it would be better and just  makes it seem as though I'm looking for her. I do mention the bed later when I say I can find neither her or it but the focus is still on her, not the bed so if someone notices the bed isn't there it won't be as jarring or bad.



2/2/17:

Today we had to perform the entire scene to the class in the same style as yesterday, being very over the top extreme. I got some good feedback for my performance and even got a few laughs when doing certain moments.

A note I got is that I'm lacking nervous energy for the character. This more applies to the asides and when I'm getting undressed. Something I'm not properly showing is the real side of him but with a sense that this may mess up but also that it's incredibly exciting. Most characters may try and play it cool all the time but in this case since Blunt isn't very good with women so he'll put on more of an act but then his anticipation will be shown since he can't really control it. It's to help with the contrasting element so it does have quite a bit of importance to improve.

One thing I really figured out today was the line "They are mercenary, prodigal whores that they want one such as". I didn't know what to make of this line, it could've meant two things. He's calling the whores in England expensive and a waste of time. It's who "One such as this" refers to, it's either him or Lucetta. He's either saying that he's too good of a man to waste his time and money on woman like that or Lucetta is a much better alternative to those women or that those women should aspire to be her. I personally am leaning more towards the former for now thought since it's more in keeping with his personality and the self indulgent, arrogant nature of it all. While rehearsing I even gave it a little moment where I gesture towards my legs and point them out as if I think I'm extremely desirable. The only thing that gives me doubt is him saying "One that is free and generous", again that could refer to either of them but seems funnier when being applied to him to big himself up.

A good note we got today was that our aside moments and intimate physical contact has been getting much better but it still needs to go further. I agree, it's just in terms of the energy level and a few nuances that we need to add in to make it more believable and playful, we just need some more actions and details to give it some life. We did have more than usual and our vocal tones more more on the right level of projection and energy than they were last time. Our entrance today was also very good due to all that although, it seemed to dip after that so it was quite inconsistent overall but still an improvement.

My fumbling scene is still fairly stiff and awkward and I found out that I will have to be very over the top with it because it will be very dark on stage and I'll have to over act in order for the funny movement to come across. I am doing OK with certain moments in it though, as I mentioned I did get a couple laughs and they were in this scene, mainly my "I am all on fire already" line so at least I know I've got a few moments that are up to a good standard, I just need to bring the rest up.




Links:


http://www.gradesaver.com/the-rover/study-guide/themes

http://www.gradesaver.com/the-rover/study-guide/the-rover-origins-and-reception

Restoration/The Rover: Blog 2

19/1/17:

Today me and Georgia had a run through of the scene and the have been a few developments:

I went over the script and questioned it's structure. I was right in thinking the script I had was marked incorrectly because the "aside" and regular moments were mixed up when labelled so it lead to me be quite confused on how to say my lines and it seemed very unnatural. For example "Sheartlakins, sweet soul, I am not used to compliment" is meant to be said to Lucetta but is labelled aside. We changed and remarked it so everything made more sense. Now I've got a greater idea of what I'm saying especially with the ending since there was no stage directions or anything to differentiate the individual moments.

One thing I can say is although my reading of the dialogue got better, throughout the whole scene I had very little idea of what to do in terms of movement since I'm not entirely sure what the full layout of the stage will be. This made the moments where I'm fumbling around a little awkward to perform and I seemed very directionless in a bad way. The scene is supposed to be funny but it just looked terrible and easily needs some work. I feel that moment will have to be focused on a t some point.

An element that really needs some work is the interactions/physical contact between me and Georgia. It's meant to be so she's trying to seduce me in order to lure me to her her house so she can rob me. With that in mind I think she'd make a fair amount of contact in order to entice me and I'd probably try to make contact with her as well, such as holding her hand or arms or trying my best to get as close as possible, just trying to embrace the whole situation.

Due to the initial misunderstandings of the text we didn't know that aside moments can't have any additional interactions. For example when I say "I'll show her husband a Spanish trick" we blocked it so that I grab her by the waist and pull her towards me but we now have to re-block that slightly since aside moments can only be speaking to/looking at the audience and the other characters either have to get on with what they're doing or stay completely still. For this she'll be staying still since there is no one else for her to interact with.

One thing we still need to block is the undressing moment towards the end. This might be something I'll have to rehearse quite a few times since I've got a feeling the timing may have to be precise since if I get undressed too late then I'll miss a cue and if I'm too early then I might just stand there looking very awkward and directionless. It's something we'll have to get to soon although it won't be able to be done until costume is decided on a fitted which hasn't been talked about as of yet.

One note I have is that with the practice today and the research into some of the lines, especially Georgia with her line "Put out the light, it may betray us else". The sinister nature of the scene is coming through and showing some good potential, hopefully that line will be said in a way that really brings out her seductive/manipulate nature in contrast to Blunts more naive/stupid and optimistic approach to everything.


Blocking:

A detail I forgot to mention about the last session where we did a bit of blocking was where we put the bed. We staged it so that it was on stage-right and it was blocked so that I'm sat on it during the scene where I'm calling to her. We thought about that today and realised that it looked pretty bad, it was so awkward to just have me sitting on the bed, saying this fairly lengthy line. I can see why we made this error though, since in the the script it says I actually go over to the bed and that a whole trap is activated and that the bed even descends into the set. So we were pretty confused and just tried it out although now we know it didn't work at all. In fact that is going to have to be changed due to that it would be impossible for us to have it as it is in the script since we don't have a stage you can descend into. So instead it now goes like this; I now put out a light and fumble around in the dark trying to find her and don't actually get on the bed which for now is still on stage. When I go to the screen she gets changed behind, I get jumped by two men and taken off stage comically yelling. I'm glad this changed has been made because it does open up more potential to be funny. Since a feature of this style is seemingly is to be funny and for the characters to over act, then allowing me to move around means I could be funny and further set up the moment I get kidnapped in a more humorous manner. I don't know how we'll do it yet, I'll have to think about it soon but as long as we can be funny then that will be ideal.


Research: 

Today I looked up more information on the play and the character of Blunt since I felt all my information was still rather limited Now I feel I have more of an idea what the scene is about and what my character is like. Some things I found out were things I already knew about him such as being naive, arrogant and easily manipulated but I found that he is someone who does seek attention especially since he's in another country than his own, he's an Englishman in Italy. He's out of his usual environemtn and that is what gets exploited about him but his other personality faults do help towards his down fall.

Something I read in the plot (Act 4, scene 5) was blunts reaction to all of it. He intends to get revenge but not on Lucetta since he may never find her again, instead he will take it out on all women and when Florinda unintentionally finds blunt after he has been robbed, he attempts to rape and beat her. This did come as a surprise to me since it did takes quite a dark direction and I'm assuming it wouldn't be played for comedy. When I read this I initially thought I should re-imagine Blunt as a darker more bitter character for my scene but after thinking about that for a minute, even if this is a drastic tone tonal shift, Blunt was still a much more out going and positive person before this happened, he may have been bitter internally and just longed for attention but this was the straw that broke the camels back, he's not just acting anymore, if he wants something, he'll take it and if he wants to prove something he'll do it. So for now I will still stick with the more uplifting, up himself, out going  although still internally arrogant version. The change was considered but I don't think I can implement it yet but still feel glad I looked it up since it's revealed a more bitter side to him.



26/1/17:

Today we had a session in which we practiced reading a poem similar to which you may hear at the beginning of a play during the restoration era. The actors/characters would all recite a poem to the audience as a prologue, giving them an idea of what their about to see. We read "A Ramble in St. James's Park". We were split into groups and asked to read out certain sections of the poem. This was a basic and fun exercise to help us get to grips with bringing out specific words and using emphasis. It was not to help coping with the structure since the poem is rhyming and the play script is not and as far as I'm aware we aren't actually doing a prologue of any kind. I found it as a good reminder to keep your clear so they don't blend together and bring out important words in the text. For example my first line of that poem was, "Much wine had passed, with grave discourse" and the two words I put the most emphasis on were "Much" and "Grave" since they were the ones describing the scenario. If you hear the word grave emphasised in a speech it makes you think of something potentially dangerous which may help in getting and keeping an audience members attention. That's just one example but it just showed me I'll have to keep that in mind and just try to give a varied performance in order to engage or communicate everything properly.


Research: 

Something I wanted to look at was the structure of the dialogue for example is it in any structured verse, like blank rhyming or prose. From reading the text with this is mind it doesn't contain any kind of concrete rhythmic structure to suggest the first two. There are no Iambic pentameters in it and none of the words rhyme or at least this is the case with my scene. I did think maybe like Shakespeare plays, the dialogue structure depends on the scene and the characters saying it but upon further research that isn't the case. So it seems as though the dialogue is written in Prose. Prose is language that follows no consistent structure but is written to have a natural flow like in a regular conversation. Even though this obviously uses a much older version of English, it's still written in the more casual manor of the time and doesn't big anyone up by making them speak in a more fancy structured verse type. It reflects the attitude that everyone is equal in these types of plays and isn't bigged up to more than they really are, these are real people and they're being mocked so that's what is portrayed and keeping the dialogue more down to earth and realistic is a good thing in order to do that.

A term that came up a couple times when reading up on the style was "Witty Prose". This is where it retains the prose structure but has the addition of focusing on trying to be funny and spontaneous
so the addition isn't with the structure, it's on the timing and manor of which it's delivered, how they're written. The characters with in the play are always trying to be on top of every thing and seem as though they are as important or the same status as everyone else and a way they go about this is being portrayed with a sense of humour/wit. Almost all the scenes seem to be a battle of wits. If you're someone who finds it difficult to understand this type of dialogue making it sound spontaneous may be quite a challenge although for now, it doesn't seem as though my scene has any focus on this with the exception of a couple lines like when I say "And though shalt see what haste I'll make to quit scores." That is a line with a heavy implication that he will do everything he can to her and is rather suggestive. It's a innuendo almost and it's said rather quickly after says her line. That again is just an example there are more like it and it's something to keep in mind, vocal variation is key to helping all of this become clear I don't think that can be stressed enough. There is nothing more boring than watching a Shakespeare or restoration play being performed in a bland manor and you have no idea what's going on so you have no idea what's going on and it's just a bunch of lavishly dressed people talking gibberish. If it's performed well though and everything is made clear then it can be legitimately entertaining and it's clearly a good style since it was so popular back in the day. A note we all got was to try and embrace the language, the last thing we should do is rush through it all. We should take our time with it, make everything clear and make it seem playful and fun. The point of these plays was to have fun so we must bring that across into our performance.

I will admit than at least initially, Restoration era dialogue seems harder to learn. Shakespeare dialogue when, we studied it had the advantage of mostly being structured so there was almost a rhythm to help with remembering them seemingly faster. This doesn't have that and the words still have the focused but the way they're arranged doesn't have much. This isn't a bad thing at all, if anything it can make it sound more down to earth which can be quite important to comedy and can make it more believable when portraying something funny. This simply means I'll have to try and get a greater understanding of my dialogue so it'll come to me more easily.



27/1/17:

Today was another rehearsal session in which we were meant to go through it detail, however we didn't get to due to problems with the cast but while it was quite an unproductive day, I still did get something out of it. When I got home I felt I hadn't done much during the day so I did a fair bit of research on the style to see if there was anything I missed. Overall I'm very glad I did since there a quite a few details that change the way I thought this was going to play out.

Acting style research:  


I found the name for the style very popular during the restoration era and the genre this play falls into. It's called "A comedy of manners" and is basically a style that focuses on satirising everyone it can through mockery of attitudes, the way they acted and the ridiculousness of everything. They did this to just be funny, it wasn't really ever seen as two harsh or discriminative since the rule was that everyone got mocked at some point and they were portrayed as uncaring, arrogant and easily manipulated morons. Everyone loved it and went to have fun. Since the era was everyone just indulging in what ever they wanted this seemed ideal to appeal to audiences, a good mockery of everyone. King Charles II even apparently loved the theatre and preferred it to be more fun rather than on the darker side. I have mentioned a couple of the features here since I'm aware of a couple but I needed to look it up further and here's what I found.

Features of the style:

- Huge amounts of innuendo or double-entendre filled dialogue. An example of this is in the second scene of our scene order in which Willmore says "Wou'd you give me leave to gather at your bush this idle month". He's flirting with a woman at this point and clearly making a reference to the fact he wants to have sex with her. That's just one example and there are a couple things that need be made clear. One thing is that the innuendos are never said explicitly, meaning they aren't spelled out and do retain their double meaning. An innuendo is rather pointless if it doesn't have an air of ambiguity to it. So it has to be said with a hint of another meaning and then most people will get it but there's still potential for some people to miss it. They're never said in a way that it's a punchline of a joke so that's it's impossible to miss and you could argue are reasonably subtle. This is something I quite like since it treats the audience intelligently while mocking them at the same time throughout the play and figuring it out for yourself adds to the fun of the experience and if it was spelled out it wouldn't be very entertaining.

- Very heightened characters. This means if a character is posh or a poor commoner then you will have no trouble working that out just from the way they act or talk. Most of the characters which are upper class express themselves by holding out one arm (usually their right) and holding the other behind their back which can suggest their status and their current feeling. The one I just listed would suggest being comfortable and generally in control where as if they had both or neither of their arms out it may seem like they are the lesser people of the situation trying to get attention or they are the people who aren't in control or of higher status, possibly even uncomfortable.

- Everyone is a target and made to look a fool. Everyone has at least one aspect to them that is flawed about them in order to bring out the comedy, whether it be how they look, talk, act or how manipulated or manipulative they can be. So my character Blunt is certainly a character that embodies a few of these qualities since the scene focuses on him being manipulated and made to look a fool for his naivety and not just his general attitude, which is still portrayed as rather up himself and attention seeking.

- Everyone is lavishly dressed and generally heavily made up. Everyone is made to look great but also some characters are overly dressed such as my character archetype, the fop. Typical men would wear clothes on the darker side of the spectrum but fops generally wear much brighter clothes in order for them to stand out and indicate their personality subconsciously.

- A feature that is common to restoration comedies, is the use of "Asides" or "Converse" as it's often called. Asides are where the character will directly talk to the audience to deliver their inner thoughts. It's like an internal soliloquy although it is actually directed at someone, in this case, whoever is watching. Whenever someone is having an aside moment, it is never so that the audience can directly answer. If a question is asked it's usually rhetorical or they're asking themselves but the audience doesn't answer despite it being directed at them. They do often contrast, an example I can think of is suspicion; the character will act casually in front of whoever they are suspicious of and then turn to the audience during an aside and then explain why and how they came to feel that way, possibly with some humorous comment about it.

- The characters often speak with overly articulated accents. This is done in an attempt to make the characters seem ridiculous/pompous. The way I see blunt as of now is like that, he sees himself as a high ranking member of society so he would make his voice sound the best he possibly could, he may give it a more masculine tone to try and impress the ladies (Although that doesn't work for him) .

A way I've tried to make this come across in my scene during this session was to make my body as big as possible, not in height but in width, so that he looked broader or at the very least having a very confident posture. When I walk in with Georgia I made sure my right arm was stretched out and that my left arm was behind my back so that blunt would look as though he's comfortable even though he isn't internally. This should help contrast with an aside when I work on those.

Something that came to mind when thinking about how the audience's loved everyone to be mocked was "schadenfreude" which means basically means finding joy in other peoples misfortune/failure, which most believe is the root of all comedy in some regard. When you some it up it can sound sadistic but really it can apply to people getting a comeuppance which is partially the case here since he just wants to sleep with this woman to better his ego and when he finally thinks he'll get what he wants, it doesn't go his way and it's surprise and disappointment that is funny. I bring this up because I feel that is an element I really need to bring across because the scene does need a consistent and fun tone throughout it to stick close to the style and that is how it's written.

I feel that if I don't big him up so that he's so naive and so confident in himself, his downfall maybe won't contrast or be a surprise to him to be funny. So making the comeuppance seem all the more deserved for blunt may be a greater pay off in a more entertaining way because if we saw a really boring man get manipulated it may come across as more sympathetic than funny so to give him that arrogant stupid side will help improve the comedy. I'll just have to make it look like he loves himself or at the very least wants to make it look like he does.

Since I found out it's more to express the secretive side of them rather than their confident side, this means the initial plan I had for my asides doesn't really work. I for some reason assumed the asides would be more loud and vibrant than the external version. This isn't right since the exterior character is basically putting on an act to make everyone think he's better than them, it doesn't work but it's still his intention. So I may have to make it so that he is acting towards her but then showing how much more pathetic or naive he can be in his asides, possibly by lowering the energy level or changing the vocal tones, I'm not to sure yet I feel I still need to experiment with that.




Links:


http://www.ealasaid.com/fan/rochester/ramble.html

http://www.gradesaver.com/the-rover/study-guide/character-list#blunt

https://prezi.com/kqk23b1pfm-y/restorationcomedy-of-manners-the-rover/

http://www.thedramateacher.com/comedy-of-manners/

http://www.backstage.com/news/acting-in-restoration-comedy/

http://johnhbartlett.blogspot.co.uk/2011/03/restoration-and-18th-century-acting.html

http://www.participations.org/volume%203/issue%201/3_01_lewcock.htm

http://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/caustic

http://www.gradesaver.com/the-rover/study-guide/summary

http://www.gradesaver.com/the-rover/study-guide/summary-act-iii-scene-ii

Restoration/The Rover: Blog 1


Introduction:

This blog will be detailing the rehearsal process and research leading up to our production of "The Rover" restoration play by Aphra Behn.

We have been split into groups of about 2 or 3 and each group has been given a scene from the play since we're not doing the full production. I was given the character of Blunt who is the plays Fop. I do have some previous experience of acting in a restoration play, having been in a production of "The Man of mode" by George Etherege although I was only a servant. Despite that I did try and observe everyone and how they were acting since I knew I would have to tackle this genre at some point. The main thing I noticed which will probably be expanded on the more I research/learn throughout this project is that every character (With the exception of the servants) exudes confidence, their body language and voice shows that they wish to be seen and heard. It seems to be a style that embraces being over the top and comical, as well as just being silly. I'm not sure if this is for satirical purposes or if there's details I'm just unaware of at this point but for now I know it to be very expressive and playful type of play.



Context of my scene:

In this scene my character, Blunt, is being seduced by a woman called Lucetta. She has no real interest in him romantically or sexually, she only wants to rob him of his money and possessions and then get rid of him. Blunt isn't very lucky when it comes to women so when this offer comes along he's very enthusiastic to take it and he is easily manipulated into going to this woman's house. He's completely fooled by her and very naive about the situation. Throughout the scene, he is lusting after this woman to the point where he doesn't question anything such as why is he getting this offer that seems to good to be true? He never questions it and just goes along with it, which results in him getting robbed and thrown out like planned.


11/1/17:


Today we started with a small session on how the people of the restoration era would act. The main portion of the session was role playing so that we were our assigned characters at a house party in order to get an idea of what the attitudes were like. My role was still the fop so based on the limited knowledge I have right now, I felt as though the fop is the one who wants the most attention of them all due to the way they dress and act. When doing this I made my posture denote confidence and would stand tall and proud as if I really want to be seen, I stood with one hand behind my back and my other stretched out, so it would signify I was accepting/willing to meet others and that I was comfortable in my environment. I realised afterwards the facial expression I was doing was one that I can only describe as insufferably smug. I genuinely did this out of instinct and it felt right especially after the history briefing we had adding context to the era and it really does seem like people back then would've acted like this. Everyone in the exercise was acting as though they were more important or gossipy of other people.

As I mentioned, we were given a quick briefing of the history and context of the restoration era. Basically after a long period of forced censorship and repression, with things like music and theatre being banned (As well as many other things) the nation went crazy with restoring everything and it basically turned into an era of self indulgence, where sex was more rampant than ever, theatre was back and was evolving with women being allowed to perform and everyone more or less getting what they wanted and having a good time doing it. After a long dull period everyone was having a laugh no matter what the expense. A detail that intrigued me was that, quite a lot of the time when people went to the theatre, It wasn't to see the play. They would usually go to see who else was attending it, socialise with important people to make themselves feel important or just to get themselves noticed, the play itself was just a bonus, which I found very odd. Although it justified what I said earlier, they were all just there to be smug and self-important so the actions and level of how much I was comfortable felt right when knowing this.

I feel I got the look right but not the way a fop should act, if anything I felt I was a little too quiet, and when I was thrown into a hypothetical situation involving a debt collector, I feel I handled it in a manor that didn't seem to be as attention grabbing as someone like this would go about it. I feel I could have gone a bit further with everything but think I've got the right overall idea for now until I look up more about the character and style.


Blocking/Ideas:

We were left to rehearse and asked to do any possible blocking. We thought of a way to come on that we felt would establish our characters/relationships. We come in through the door (Which is upstage centre) and I would run towards the front and sort of present myself while Georgia shuts the door and then the "Romantic" dialogue begins. The idea to present myself seemed fitting with what I mentioned about them wanting to be noticed and that they would most likely play up everything whenever they could to whoever they were with. The confident stride in is up for change though since I'm not sure if it would work because they're alone. It's possible this would only be in crowds and he may not need to do this when around her since he thinks he's already won her over, so I may down play that a little but this is all experimentation.

After the first basic-blocked run we did, I gave a note saying this doesn't seem intimate at all since we didn't make any physical contact. Seeing as she's trying to seduce me it, seems very necessary to have some so it could add to the playfulness of the style as well as bringing across the flirtiness and anticipation that Blunt is seemingly going through. It also will hopefully bring across the deception if it's done correctly but unfortunately what we tried out was very awkward although both of us still see the potential of the idea and will practice it further. It may not work yet but we think it's a good idea and accurate to the times to have at least some romantic/flirty contact.


Research: 

Today I decided to do a bit of research on the typical fop character just to confirm any assumptions I made from the session or previous experience with "Man of Mode":

What is a Fop?:

A fop is often the comedic relief of sorts of a restoration play, as in he is the most flamboyant, most energetic, most made up and the most self indulgent.

Characteristics:

- Fops don't just wear traditional Restoration clothing, they tend to go a step further such as dressing a tad brighter, more make-up with more colour and possibly even some patterns. They may wear white wigs instead of a more seemingly traditional black, brown or grey wig that most men wear. There general appearance is very bright with a lot of blues and greens being worn or at the very least more bright colours than most people. This is fitting since it does actually help them stand out visually amongst the other characters and reflects their personalities well. The character has a desire to stand out and be noticed so the fact their clothing fits with that thematically I quite like.

- Their behaviour is often characterised as "Metro-sexual". This basically means they they typically indulge in things such as shopping, fashion, make up and any thing that would be described as similar to the behaviour of women or homosexual men, however most fops (And in this case Blunt) are heterosexual, so their behaviour and their sexuality very rarely correlate. They can act fairly camp and in most cases they seem to go more overboard than everyone else, they are often more excitable and more enthusiastic than everyone else.

- Another feature may be flamboyance and/or having a higher pitched campy voice although this really only applies to a few fops since I have found a fair few who have rather deep voices and the flamboyance can just apply to their behaviour rather than just their voice. Someone like Sir Fopling Flutter does have a higher voice where as Blunt seemingly wouldn't, or at least be no way near the level but still have a camp tone possibly.

- Of all restoration era archetypes they are the ones who are considered to be the most attention seeking. This is due to the aforementioned indulgent behaviour, they like to have everything they want and like to show it off. Again, Sir Fopling Flutter seemed like he was trying to stand out and make his indulgent nature seem important or that it gave him an air of superiority despite the fact that with most fops that isn't the case, it either back fires and they get mocked, either lightly or heavily, or they are just seen as equals but in a different way to everyone else.

All these features make them the stand out characters of the play in general. I will admit that this will be a fair challenge since to get all those elements correct and to make people laugh without unintentionally annoying would be quite an accomplishment. This kind of performance can easily backfire, if I don't have enough energy then I will just look silly but come across as very dull and if I go to overboard in the wrong way then I could come off as unintentionally annoying. This means I'll have to find a way to balance the act when I've got to grips with what my character is saying.

Here are a few picture examples of fops:


Image result for restoration fopsRelated imageImage result for restoration fops














A good example of a fop in modern media in my opinion is Prince George played by Hugh Laurie from the TV show "Blackadder the Third". He is someone who is lavishly dressed, wears far more make up than any other man in the show and has a fairly camp but also naive and childish demeanour about him almost like he wants be/believes he is loved by everyone. The character is overall likeable despite being a complete idiot and very annoying to the protagonist and overall embodies what a fop is and when comparing him to someone like Sir Fopling Flutter will give me a more general idea of how a fop can act. I did think that Sir Fopling Flutter was the only way a fop should be played but it seems as though he is just the most extreme and outrageous version of that type of character which is why I've used him for quite a few of my examples/characteristics.



12/1/17:

Today I spent the day trying to learn my lines and experiment with a couple of ideas since Georgia was not in so we couldn't really continue blocking the scene or talk about it in general so I felt I had to use the time as best as I could.

However there was one development I feel I can comment on. The presenting out moment I talked about yesterday, I think we need to scrap it. I felt that if we kept it then it would take away quite a lot of the potential intimacy of the scene. The more time we spend close to each other, the more the character is likely to buy her lie and therefore the audience understand how he's being deceived. During any aside moment I think it would be done and my stance could be very over the top but any moment with her would be a tad more reserved since he would want to convince the audience of his power over her (and by extension himself) but when it cuts back to the in the room he may be more reserved but still energetic towards her. I feel that the theatrical, playful side may come out more when directly addressing the people in the audience.




Links:


Clip of a Fop: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tjvZv-ZRnc

Clip of "Blackadder the Third": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01R_lP51Pw0

https://britishheritage.com/charles-ii-and-the-restoration/

http://www.gradesaver.com/the-man-of-mode/study-guide/character-list#dorimant

http://www.gradesaver.com/the-rover/study-guide/summary-act-iii-scene-ii